AARON MEDLIN
  • CV
  • Research
    • Publications
    • Research Plans
    • Dissertation
    • Working Papers
    • Graduate Papers
    • Undergraduate Papers
  • Teaching
    • Econ 191 Economics Behind Our Lives (Fall 2021)
    • Econ 204 Intermediate Macro (Summer 2021)
    • Econ 397: Debt Economics (Spring 2021)
  • Commentary
    • American Prospect
    • Medium posts

Don’t overreact to the cost of producing pennies, the business of minting coins is still quite profitable

7/12/2018

 
Vox Media has an interesting YouTube video floating around on Facebook about pennies (see below). If you haven’t seen it, you have probably heard a take on the theme: pennies are useless and cost the government more money to make them than they are worth ($0.0107 per penny). While this is true, one might be misled into believing that the government is somehow losing millions of dollars from the manufacturing of the currency, but it’s not when you factor in the rest of coins and bills the U.S. produces into the equation.
In monetary economics, there is a concept called “seigniorage”; which dates back to the Middle Ages from Old French seigneuriage “right of the lord (seigneur) to mint money”. Seigniorage is generally defined as the net revenue or profit, if you will, from the face value of the coinage or token minted minus the cost of production and maintenance. For example, the cost of producing a dollar bill is a couple cents (say $0.05), so the rest of the value generated by producing a dollar bill ($0.95) counts as revenue to the treasury. So even though it costs $0.0107 to make a penny, the treasury is not losing money when you factor in the combined seigniorage revenue from all the coins and bills produced into circulation; it’s still a huge positive net revenue. In 2016, in fact, the U.S. Mint reported seigniorage net income of $668.5 million before protection costs.

So while it’s true that pennies cost, and maybe they are useless, it’s not really a big deal to keep them either. By getting rid of them, it would simply increase the net revenue to the treasury. Personally, I would be fine with getting rid of them, and it would not be an issue as many countries have already done it such as Canada and Australia. But let’s not overreact to the cost of producing them when you consider how much seigniorage revenue is still gained from producing $5, $10 bills, $20 bills, etc.

Comments are closed.
    Picture

    AUTHOR

    Aaron Medlin is a PhD student at the University of Massachusetts Amherst studying macroeconomics of private debt, monetary economics, international finance, and comparative economic systems.

    Archives

    July 2020
    April 2020
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    February 2016
    January 2016

    Categories

    All
    Bernie Sanders
    Capital
    Coinage
    Communism
    Coronavirus
    Covid-19
    Currency
    Das Kapital
    Democratic Socialism
    Dialectical Materialism
    Economics
    Economy
    Endogenous Money
    Financial Crisis
    Financial Intermediation
    Great Recession
    Gun Control
    History
    Interest Rates
    Janus V AFSCME
    Karl Marx
    Keynes
    Labor Market
    Macroeconomics
    Marxism
    Monetary Policy
    Monopsony
    Neoclassical Model
    Political Economy
    Political Science
    Post-Keynesian
    Seigniorage
    Socialism
    Socialist Systems
    Soviet System
    Soviet Union
    State Socialism
    Theory Of Second Best
    Unions

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
  • CV
  • Research
    • Publications
    • Research Plans
    • Dissertation
    • Working Papers
    • Graduate Papers
    • Undergraduate Papers
  • Teaching
    • Econ 191 Economics Behind Our Lives (Fall 2021)
    • Econ 204 Intermediate Macro (Summer 2021)
    • Econ 397: Debt Economics (Spring 2021)
  • Commentary
    • American Prospect
    • Medium posts